Definition: Every vow, and every binding oath to afflict the soul, her husband may establish it, or her husband may make it void.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Numbers 30:13. It’s a pretty serious statement about respect and boundaries! Here's an explanation in simpler terms: Basically, this verse is saying that someone can legally create a binding vow or oath – a promise – to hurt or harm another person’s husband. Let’s unpack it further: “Every vow, and every binding oath…” This means any kind of promise, whether it's a formal agreement or just a heartfelt word, that is intended to cause pain or distress to someone else. “…to afflict the soul, her husband.” This is the key part. "Afflict the soul" refers to hurting the spirit (soul) of your husband – causing him emotional pain, distress, and potentially even leading to harm. It's about spiritual damage. “May establish it, or may make it void.” This gives two options: Establish it: The person making the vow can legally enforce it. They can take action against their husband if they break the promise. Make it void: They can simply cancel the vow. It's like saying, “I’m not going to follow through with this.” What does this mean in practice? This verse is a reminder that you need to be very careful about what you say and do, especially when it comes to your spouse. It emphasizes: Respect: You have a responsibility to treat your husband with respect and honor. Boundaries: Don’t cross boundaries – don't make promises or commitments that could cause him harm. Legal Consequences: If you break a vow, there can be legal consequences for both of you (depending on the laws in the area). Important Note: This verse is from an ancient text and was part of a legal system focused on protecting relationships. It’s not meant to be taken lightly – it highlights the importance of responsible behavior within those relationships. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the context behind this verse in more detail? Answer any specific questions you might have about it?